Commentaries - September 2007

Poetry (n) the public spear

Back to Maria Damon's critical essays for a moment. I've just read "Was That 'Different,' 'Dissident' or 'Dissonant'?Poetry (n) the Public Spear: Slams, Open Readings, and Dissident Traditions."

Maggie O'Sullivan

Maggie O'Sullivan will be reading at the Writers House on October 11Maggie O'Sullivan will be reading at the Writers House

  • Read more
  • "Has not adopted a minority tone"

    Saul Bellow's review of Invisible Man praised Ralph Ellison for his independence from what was then called Negro writing.

    George Oppen

    "Things explain each other, not themselves." How true....of all of us, but especially of Oppen.
    "Things explain each other, not themselves." How true....of all of us, but especially of Oppen.

    Poetry goes with conservatism, prose with liberalism

    So said Peter Viereck in the 1950s

    Peter Viereck

    Peter Viereck energetically contended that prose was inherently associated with liberalism and poetry with conservatism. Hardly anything could irk a conservative anti-modernist of the postwar period more than the brazen way in which radical and avant-garde poets ignored the distinction between the proper stations and functions of poetry and prose. Eve Merriam, for instance, in a poem called “Said Prose to Verse”:

    Listen, my insinuating poem,
    stop poking your grinning face into every anywhere.
    I have trouble enough keeping my house in order
    without a free-loading moon-swigging boarder around
    making like a solid ground.


    For Viereck, conservatism “embodies” rather than “argues,” and whereas poetry in the 1930s argued exactly as if it were prose, conservatism could claim a closer connection to poetry than did the liberal-left. The liberals of Viereck's time could have prose; poetry — real poetry that did not poke its face into every empirical anywhere — would best be realized by conservatives.

    Following Yeats's distinction between embodying truth and knowing it, Viereck wrote, “Poetry tends to embody truth, prose to know it. Conservatism tends to embody truth, liberalism to know it.”